Abstract
The singular isobaric heat capacity of nitrogen, methane, water and hydrogen at critical pressure is studied over an extended temperature range, from the melting point to the high-temperature cutoff of the experimental data sets. The high- and low-temperature branches (above and below the critical temperature ) of can accurately be modeled with broken power-law distributions in which the calculated universal scaling exponent of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure is implemented. (The enumerated fluids admit 3D Ising critical exponents). The parameters of these distributions are inferred by nonlinear least-squares regression from high-precision data sets. In each case, a non-perturbative analytic expression for is obtained. The broken power laws have closed-form Index functions representing the Log–Log slope of the regressed branches of . These Index functions quantify the crossover from the experimentally more accessible high- and low-temperature regimes to the critical scaling regime. Ideal power-law scaling (without perturbative corrections and discounting impurities and gravitational rounding effects) of occurs in a narrow interval, typically within or even depending on the fluid, and the regressed broken power-law densities provide closed-form analytic extensions of to the melting point and up to dissociation temperatures.
Graphical Abstract
1 Introduction
The topic of this paper is the global analytic modeling of thermodynamic functions with critical-point singularities. Specifically, we will calculate the heat capacity at constant pressure along the critical isobar of nitrogen, methane, water and hydrogen. Non-perturbative closed-form expressions will be obtained for the high- and low-temperature heat-capacity branches of the mentioned fluids, by combining least-squares regression (from data sets outside the ideal power-law scaling regime) with the critical scaling predicted by renormalization-group theory [1].
Empirical heat-capacity data for a variety of pure component fluids, stretching from the melting point up to dissociation temperatures, are available in machine-readable synthetic form [2, 3], derived from multiparameter equations of state (EoSs), cf., e.g., Refs. [4,5,6,7]. These EoSs were in turn regressed from a collection of experimental data covering several temperature and pressure intervals, usually well separated from the critical point and outside the two-phase region. Experimental data in the critical scaling regime are only available for a limited number of single-component fluids and mixtures and a limited number of thermodynamic variables such as the isochoric heat capacity or isothermal compressibility [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. As for the latter two, simple power-law scaling is typically observed in an interval of width or . At temperatures within , a gravitationally generated density gradient causes deviations from power-law scaling, resulting in a rounding of the straight Log–Log slopes, unless the experiments are done at zero gravity, cf., e.g., Refs. [20,21,22,23]. The easy availability of extended data sets makes it attractive to model thermodynamic functions with critical singularities empirically and globally without the use of perturbative expansions, by employing calculated universal scaling properties such as critical exponents and universal amplitude ratios in the vicinity of the critical point where data points are lacking.
In the case of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure , there are virtually no experimental data available in the ideal power-law scaling regime, where critical scaling theory predicts , cf. Refs. [24, 25], due to the emergence of long-range correlations as exemplified in Refs. [23, 26]. The subscripts of the amplitude refer to the and branches of , respectively. Nitrogen, methane, water and hydrogen are fluids of the 3D Ising universality class [1], with exponent , cf., e.g., Ref. [27].
Synthetic precision data for the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure are available for the mentioned fluids outside the interval , cf. Refs. [2, 3]. We will demonstrate that the Log–Log slope of the critical heat capacity curve in the empirical temperature range does not exceed 0.7 for any of these fluids. This value is noticeably below the calculated Log–Log slope of in the critical power-law scaling regime of the 3D Ising class. The purpose of this paper is to extend the experimental data range to the ideal power-law scaling regime by means of the calculated scaling exponent . To this end, we will use multiply broken power-law densities [28, 29] to model the high- and low-temperature branches of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure. These densities are very adaptable and especially suitable for large data sets stretching over several logarithmic decades (in reduced temperature in this case), being composed as multiple products of simple power laws [30,31,32,33,34] and generalized beta distributions [35, 36]. The regressed densities cover the experimental data range from the melting point upward, as well as the critical scaling regime where they admit the above stated power-law asymptotics with calculated exponent .
In Sect. 2, we discuss the temperature evolution of the isobaric heat capacity of nitrogen at critical pressure, of methane in Sect. 3, of water in Sect. 4 and of the quantum fluid hydrogen in Sect. 5. In each section, we give an overview of the available experimental data [2, 3], which clearly indicate the singularity of , even though the data sets are still far off the critical power-law scaling regime. The broken power-law densities used for the high- and low-temperature branches of these fluids (and of CO2 studied in Ref. [37]) are similarly structured as finite products of power-law factors; the nonlinear least-squares regression of these multiparameter distributions is outlined in Appendix 1.
In Sects. 2, 3, 4, 5, we also study Index functions describing the evolution of the Log–Log slope of the regressed heat-capacity branches over the temperature range covered, cf., e.g., Refs. [30, 35, 38,39,40,41], from the experimental low- and high-temperature regions into the critical scaling regime, where the Index functions reach a constant limit, which is the scaling exponent of . By plotting these Index functions, one can thus obtain a quantitative depiction of the crossover from the high- and low-temperature regimes to the critical scaling regime. In particular, the temperature interval can be estimated in which ideal power-law scaling without perturbative scaling corrections occurs. In Sect. 6, we present our conclusions.
2 Isobaric heat capacity of nitrogen at critical pressure
As a first orientation, synthetic experimental data for the isobaric heat capacity of nitrogen, cf. Refs. [2, 3], are plotted in Fig. 1, at critical pressure . Figure 1 shows a Log–Log plot of data against reduced temperature , from the melting point at up to 125.6 K and from 126.8 K up to 2000 K. (Log denotes the decadic logarithm.) The critical temperature of nitrogen is . Critical point parameters are denoted by , where is the molar density and the molar volume, cf. Table 1. Despite the pronounced singularity in Fig. 1, the indicated temperature ranges are still by about two orders separated from the scaling regime, where with critical exponent , cf. Ref. [27]. The subscripts refer to temperatures above and below . That is, for and for .
To model the crossover from the empirical data in Fig. 1 to the scaling regime, we parametrize the heat capacity with the scaling variable , , writing and splitting the temperature range into a low-temperature interval between melting point and and a high-temperature interval above . Thus, in the low-temperature interval, the scaling variable is , . In the high-temperature interval, , . In either case, the critical temperature corresponds to . Figure 2 shows Log–Log plots of the isobaric heat-capacity data (the same as in Fig. 1) as a function of instead of reduced temperature . The low-temperature () data points are depicted as filled squares and the high-temperature () data as open squares, covering the same temperature range as in Fig. 1.
2.1 High-temperature regime above the critical temperature
The data set , , in the high-temperature regime () comprises 460 data points in the interval between 126.8 K and 2000 K (open squares in Fig. 2, taken from Refs. [2, 3]).
The least-squares fit above is performed with the multiply broken power law, cf. Refs. [28, 29, 37],
with positive amplitudes , , positive exponents , , and real exponent as parameters.
The asymptotic limit of (2.1) is , with exponent and amplitude
We can use the scaling exponent and the first equation in (2.2) to eliminate the parameter in .
The least-squares regression of is explained in Appendix 1 and is based on supercritical data points , , referenced above. The fitting parameters , and are recorded in Table 2, including the amplitude in (2.2). (The decadic logarithm rather than the amplitude is listed in this table.) The regressed high-temperature component (2.1) of the isobaric heat capacity is depicted in Fig. 2 as red solid curve.
In Fig. 1, the isobaric heat capacity is parametrized with reduced temperature . The red solid curve in this figure is the high-temperature in (2.1) with substituted (shortcut ).
Figure 3 depicts the Index function, cf., e.g., Refs. [30, 35, 38,39,40,41],
i.e., the Log–Log slope (red solid curve) of the regressed high-temperature heat capacity in (2.1),
To better relate Figs. 2 and 3, we have plotted data points (open squares) on the Index curve, using the abscissas of the data points in Fig. 2 (also indicated by open squares).
2.2 Low-temperature interval between melting point and critical temperature
The data set used for the regression of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure in the subcritical interval comprises 155 data points between and 125.6 K (filled squares in Fig. 2, taken from Refs. [2, 3]).
The least-squares fit of the low-temperature branch of is performed with the broken power law
The amplitudes , and exponents , are positive, and the exponent is real. The asymptotic power-law scaling of in (2.5) reads , with
The exponent in (2.5) can be eliminated via the first identity in (2.6), using the calculated scaling exponent .
The least-squares regression of in (2.5) is analogous to the regression of the high-temperature component of the heat capacity in Sect. 2.1, based on the subcritical data set , , , referenced above. The fitting parameters , are listed in Table 2, as well as the amplitude in (2.6). The regressed is shown in Fig. 2 as green solid curve. The red and green straight lines in Fig. 2 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling . In Fig. 1, is plotted as a function of reduced temperature (green solid curve in Fig. 1).
The Index function of the low-temperature heat capacity in (2.5) is depicted in Fig. 3 as green solid curve,
which is the Log–Log slope of the low-temperature branch of the heat capacity in Fig. 2. Along the Index curve in Fig. 3, we have indicated data points (filled squares) with the same abscissas as the low-temperature points in Fig. 2.
Outside the interval , the Index functions in Fig. 3 do not exceed 0.7. The complement of this interval is covered by the open and filled squares in Figs. 2 and 3, representing synthetic data sets of the critical isobaric N2 heat capacity from Refs. [2, 3]. The slope of exhibiting the critical power-law scaling of the isobaric heat capacity is only reached for temperatures extremely close to , , see Fig. 3 (where corresponds to ), far outside the temperature range of the empirical data.
Figure 4 shows the heat-capacity branches in reduced-temperature parametrization, , , and is otherwise analogous to Fig. 2. The red and green straight lines in Fig. 4 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling . The Index curves of the high- and low-temperature heat-capacity branches in reduced-temperature parametrization are plotted in Fig. 5.
3 Critical isobaric heat capacity of methane
The reasoning in this section and Sect. 4 (heat capacity of water) is quite analogous to the discussion of the nitrogen heat capacity in Sect. 2. Experimental data for the isobaric heat capacity of methane, cf. Refs. [2, 3], are plotted in Fig. 6, at critical pressure . Figure 6 shows a Log–Log plot of data against reduced temperature , from the melting point at up to 190 K and from 191.5 K up to 625 K. The critical temperature of methane is , cf. Table 1.
To model the crossover from the empirical data in Fig. 6 to the scaling regime (where and ), we parametrize the heat capacity with the scaling variable , . Figure 7 shows Log–Log plots of the isobaric heat-capacity data as a function of . The low-temperature () data points are depicted as filled squares and the high-temperature () data as open squares, covering the same temperature range as in Fig. 6.
3.1 Heat capacity as broken power law: high-temperature interval from up to 625 K
The data set , , used for regression in the high-temperature regime () comprises 366 data points in the interval between 191.5 K and 625 K (open squares in Fig. 7, cf. Refs. [2, 3]).
The least-squares fit above is performed with the broken power law already stated in (2.5), with positive amplitudes , , positive exponents , , and real exponent as parameters. The asymptotic limit of the broken power law (2.5) is , with exponent and amplitude , cf. (2.6). We use the scaling exponent and eliminate the exponent of in (2.5) by substituting .
The least-squares regression of in (2.5) (with the indicated constraints) is based on supercritical data points , , referenced above. The fitting parameters ,, are recorded in Table 2. The regressed high-temperature branch (2.5) of the isobaric heat capacity of methane is depicted in Fig. 7 as red solid curve.
In Fig. 6, the isobaric heat capacity is parametrized with reduced temperature . The red solid curve in this figure is the regressed high-temperature in (2.5) and Table 2 with substituted (shortcut ). The data points in Figs. 6 and 7 are identical.
Figure 8 shows the Index function (2.7), i.e., the Log–Log slope (red solid curve) of the regressed high-temperature heat capacity of methane. To relate Figs. 7 and 8, we have plotted data points (open squares) on the Index curve, using the abscissas of the data points in Fig. 7.
3.2 Regression of the heat capacity in the interval
The data set used for the regression of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure in the subcritical interval comprises 197 data points between and 190 K (filled squares in Fig. 7, from Refs. [2, 3]).
The least-squares fit of the low-temperature branch of is also performed with the broken power law (2.5), subject to the constraints (2.6). The exponent of is eliminated by way of the first identity in (2.6). The least-squares regression of in (2.5) is based on subcritical data points , , referenced above. The fitting parameters ,, and the amplitude in (2.6) are recorded in Table 2. The regressed low-temperature () heat capacity of methane is shown in Fig. 7 as green solid curve. The red and green straight lines in Fig. 7 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling of the high- and low-temperature branches of the isobaric heat capacity. In Fig. 6, is plotted as a function of reduced temperature (shortcut , green solid curve in Fig. 6).
The Index function (2.7) (i.e., Log–Log slope) of the low-temperature heat capacity in (2.5) and Fig. 7 is depicted in Fig. 8 as green solid curve. On this Index curve in Fig. 8, we have indicated data points (filled squares) with the same abscissas as the subcritical data points in Fig. 7 (also depicted by filled squares).
Outside the interval , the Index functions in Fig. 8 do not exceed 0.7. The complement of this interval is covered by the open and filled squares in Figs. 7 and 8, representing empirical data sets of the critical isobaric CH4 heat capacity from Refs. [2, 3]. The Log–Log slope of defining the critical power-law scaling of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure is only reached for temperatures extremely close to , in the interval , cf. Fig. 8, far outside the temperature range of the empirical data of Refs. [2, 3]. Figures 9 and 10 show the high- and low-temperature heat capacities and their Index functions in reduced-temperature parametrization, , , and are otherwise analogous to Figs. 7 and 8. The red and green straight lines in Fig. 9 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling .
4 Critical isobaric heat capacity of water
Experimental data for the isobaric heat capacity of water, cf. Refs. [2, 3], are plotted in Fig. 11, at critical pressure of . Figure 11 shows a Log–Log plot of the data sets against reduced temperature , from the melting point at up to 646.4 K and from 647.6 K to 1273 K. The critical temperature of water is , cf. Table 2.
To model the crossover from the empirical data in Fig. 11 to the scaling regime, we parametrize the heat capacity with the scaling variable . Figure 12 shows Log–Log plots of the heat-capacity data as a function of . The low-temperature () data points are depicted as filled squares and the high-temperature () data as open squares, covering the same temperature range as in Fig. 11. in Fig. 11 corresponds to in Fig. 12.
4.1 Analytic closed-form modeling of the heat capacity at critical pressure: high-temperature regime from to 1270 K
The data set , , in the high-temperature regime () comprises 280 data points in the interval between 647.6 K and 1273 K (open squares in Fig. 10, cf. Refs. [2, 3]). The least-squares fit above is performed with the broken power law in (2.5), with positive amplitudes , , positive exponents , , and real exponent as parameters. The asymptotic limit of the broken power law (2.5) is , with exponent and amplitude . We use the calculated scaling exponent and eliminate the exponent in by way of the first identity.
The least-squares regression of in (2.5) is based on supercritical data points , , referenced above. The fitting parameters ,, and the derived asymptotic amplitude are recorded in Table 2. The regressed high-temperature branch (2.5) of the isobaric heat capacity of water is depicted in Fig. 12 as red solid curve.
Figure 11 depicts the critical isobaric heat capacity of water parametrized with reduced temperature . The red solid curve in this figure shows in (2.5) with substituted (shortcut ).
Figure 13 depicts the Index function (2.7) (red solid curve), i.e., the Log–Log slope of the regressed high-temperature heat capacity in Fig. 12. To relate Figs. 12 and 13, we have plotted data points (open squares) on the Index curve, using the abscissas of the supercritical data points in Fig. 12 (also indicated by open squares).
4.2 Heat capacity in the subcritical interval above the melting point
The data set used for the regression of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure in the interval comprises 183 data points between and 646.4 K (filled squares in Fig. 12, from Refs. [2, 3]).
The least-squares fit of the low-temperature () branch of is performed with the broken power law in (2.5). The exponent in is eliminated via the first equation in (2.6) to obtain the asymptotic power-law scaling with calculated exponent .
The least-squares regression of in (2.5) is explained in Appendix 1, using the subcritical data points , , referenced above. The fitting parameters ,, are recorded in Table 2. The regressed low-temperature branch of is shown in Fig. 12 as green solid curve. In Fig. 11, is plotted as a function of reduced temperature (shortcut , green solid curve). The red and green straight lines in Fig. 12 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling .
The Index function (2.7) of the low-temperature heat capacity (cf. (2.5) and Table 2) is depicted in Fig. 13 as green solid curve, which represents the Log–Log slope of the subcritical branch of in Fig. 12. Along the (green solid) Index curve in Fig. 13, we have indicated data points (filled squares) with the same abscissas as the subcritical data points in Fig. 12 (also depicted by filled squares).
Outside the interval , the Index functions in Fig. 13 do not exceed 0.7. The complement of this interval is covered by the open and filled squares in Figs. 12 and 13, representing empirical data sets of the isobaric heat capacity of water from Refs. [2, 3]. The slope of defining the critical power-law scaling of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure is only reached for temperatures extremely close to , , see Fig. 13, far outside the temperature range of the empirical data of Refs. [2, 3]. Figures 14 and 15 show the high- and low-temperature heat-capacity branches and their Index functions reparametrized with reduced temperature , . The red and green straight lines in Fig. 14 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling .
5 Hydrogen: critical isobaric heat capacity of a quantum fluid
Synthetic experimental data for the isobaric heat capacity of hydrogen, cf. Refs. [2, 3], are plotted in Fig. 16, at the critical pressure of . Figure 16 shows a Log–Log plot of data against reduced temperature , from the melting point at up to 32.6 K and from 33.8 K to 1000 K. The critical temperature of hydrogen is , cf. Table 1.
To model the crossover from the empirical data in Fig. 16 to the scaling regime, where with , we parametrize the heat capacity with the scaling variable , . Figure 17 shows Log–Log plots of the isobaric heat-capacity data as a function of instead of reduced temperature. The low-temperature () data points are depicted as filled squares and the high-temperature () data as open squares, covering the same temperature range as in Fig. 16. in Fig. 16 is mapped to infinity in Fig. 17.
5.1 High-temperature interval from up to 1000 K
The data set , , in the high-temperature regime () comprises 398 data points in the interval between 33.8 K and 1000 K (open squares in Fig. 17, taken from Refs. [2, 3]). The least-squares fit above is performed with the multiply broken power law
with positive amplitudes , , positive exponents , , and real exponent as parameters. The asymptotic limit of the broken power law (5.1) is , with exponent and amplitude
The exponent in (5.1) is eliminated via the first identity in (5.2), using the calculated 3D Ising scaling exponent .
The least-squares regression of is explained in Appendix 1 and based on the data points , , quoted above. The fitting parameters ,, and the scaling amplitude are recorded in Table 2. The regressed high-temperature branch (5.1) of the critical isobaric heat capacity is depicted in Fig. 17 as red solid curve.
In Fig. 16, the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure is parametrized with reduced temperature . The red solid curve in this figure is the regressed high-temperature branch in (5.1) with , , substituted (shortcut ). The data points depicted in Fig. 16 are the same as in Fig. 17.
Figure 18 shows the Index function, i.e., the Log–Log slope (red solid curve) of the regressed high-temperature heat capacity in (5.1),
To relate Figs. 17, 18, we have plotted data points (open squares) on the Index curve, using the abscissas of the high-temperature data points in Fig. 17 (also indicated by open squares).
5.2 Regression of the heat capacity in the subcritical regime between and
The data set used for the regression of the isobaric heat capacity of hydrogen at critical pressure in the low-temperature interval comprises 92 data points between and 32.6 K (filled squares in Figs. 16 and 17, cf. Refs. [2, 3]). The least-squares fit of the low-temperature branch of is performed with the broken power law
The amplitudes , and exponents , are positive, and the exponent is real. The asymptotic power-law scaling of in (5.4) reads , with
We use the scaling exponent to eliminate the exponent from in (5.4) by way of the first equation in (5.5).
The least-squares regression of in (5.4) is based on the subcritical data set , , , indicated above. The fitting parameters ,, and the derived scaling amplitude are listed in Table 2. The regressed is shown in Fig. 17 as green solid curve. The red and green straight lines in Fig. 17 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling of the high- and low-temperature branches (5.1) and (5.4) of .
In Fig. 16, the regressed subcritical is plotted as a function of reduced temperature (shortcut , green solid curve); the data points depicted in this figure are the same as in Fig. 17.
The Index function (Log–Log slope) of the low-temperature heat-capacity branch in (5.4) (and Fig. 17),
is depicted in Fig. 18 as green solid curve. On this Index curve, we have indicated data points (filled squares) with the same abscissas as the subcritical data points in Fig. 17 (also depicted by filled squares).
Outside the interval , the Index functions in Fig. 18 do not exceed 0.7, except for a section of the subcritical branch close to the melting point. The complement of this interval is covered by the open and filled squares in Figs. 17 and 18, representing empirical data sets of the critical isobaric heat capacity of hydrogen from Refs. [2, 3]. The slope of defining the critical power-law scaling of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure is only reached for temperatures extremely close to , in the interval , see Fig. 18, far outside the temperature range of the empirical data of Refs. [2, 3]. Figures 19 and 20 show the high- and low-temperature heat-capacity branches and their Index functions reparametrized with reduced temperature , . The red and green straight lines in Fig. 19 depict the asymptotic power-law scaling .
6 Conclusion
The scaling theory of critical-point singularities in thermodynamic functions is experimentally amply evidenced, being largely consistent with the measured critical exponents and amplitude ratios [1, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. (There are a few exceptions, though. For instance, the scaling exponent of the order parameter was measured for two binary mixtures in Refs. [42, 43] and found to exceed the calculated 3D Ising exponent by about 12 percent.) The predicted power-law scaling is observable in the immediate vicinity of the critical point, leaving aside gravitational rounding effects, which set in at about , cf., e.g., Ref. [20].
In experimental papers, it is customary to consider a wider interval, typically , and least-squares regression based on a perturbative ascending series expansion in reduced temperature, obtained by adding correction-to-scaling terms to the asymptotic power law in this extended scaling regime, cf., e.g., Refs. [11, 13, 17]. The power-law exponents are mostly identified with the calculated scaling exponents of the respective universality class, and the series coefficients are obtained by linear regression, in this way achieving consistency with renormalization-group calculations and universality.
The ideal power-law scaling interval of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure is particularly narrow ( for nitrogen, methane and water, and for hydrogen), as illustrated by Index functions in Figs. 5, 10, 15 and 20. The topic of this paper was the modeling of the critical isobaric heat capacity of fluids over a much wider temperature range far beyond the power-law scaling regime and the extended scaling regime where power-law scaling still holds with perturbative corrections. Closed-form analytic representations of the isobaric heat capacity at critical pressure were derived for nitrogen, methane, water and hydrogen, which are applicable from the melting point to the high-temperature regime where dissociation sets in.
Over this temperature range, it is not feasible to use perturbative series expansions around the critical temperature. In a safe distance from the scaling regime (quantified for the individual fluids at the beginning of each of Sects. 2, 3, 4, 5 in terms of temperature intervals), there are plenty of reliable precision data available [2, 3] for the heat capacity of the fluids studied in this paper, and we used a set of elementary closed-form distribution functions that allow for accurate nonlinear least-squares regression in the mentioned temperature range. (In the case of hydrogen, the upper temperature limit of the data range is 1000 K; dissociation into an electron–proton plasma occurs at around 5000 K.) As summarized in the caption of Table 2, the regressed distributions are structured as broken power laws factorizing as and are parametrized with reciprocal reduced temperature . The fitting parameters were constrained to reproduce the asymptotic power-law scaling with calculated scaling exponent .
A systematic regression method for multiply broken power-law densities is explained in Appendix 1, and the accuracy of the least-squares fits to the experimental data sets is documented in Table 2 by the recorded value of the minimized least-squares functional of the respective fluid and, more importantly, by the residual plots in Figs. 2, 7, 12 and 17, which show the local percentage deviations of the data points from the regressed high- and low-temperature branches of the heat capacity. In Figs. 4, 9, 14 and 19, the regressed heat capacities of nitrogen, methane, water and hydrogen are depicted in reduced-temperature parametrization over several logarithmic decades, illustrating the non-perturbative analytic extension of the critical scaling regime to cover the entire temperature range from the melting point to the high-temperature regime, up to dissociation temperatures.
Data Availability Statement
The data sets analyzed during the current study are available on the NIST web pages https://www.nist.gov/srd/refprop and https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/, see Refs. [2, 3].
References
A. Pelissetto, E. Vicari, Phys. Rep. 368, 549 (2002). https://doi-org../10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00219-3
E.W. Lemmon, I.H. Bell, M.L. Huber, M.O. McLinden, NIST Standard Reference Database 23, Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 10.0, 2018. https://www.nist.gov/srd/refprop
E.W. Lemmon, M.O. McLinden, D.G. Friend, in P.J. Linstrom, W.G. Mallard (Eds.), NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database 69 (2021). https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/
R. Span, E.W. Lemmon, R.T. Jacobsen, W. Wagner, A. Yokozeki, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 29, 1361 (2000). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.1349047
U. Setzmann, W. Wagner, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 20, 1061 (1991). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.555898
W. Wagner, A. Pruß, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 31, 387 (2002). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.1461829
J.W. Leachman, R.T. Jacobsen, S.G. Penoncello, E.W. Lemmon, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 38, 721 (2009). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.3160306
H. Güttinger, D.S. Cannell, Phys. Rev. A 24, 3188 (1981). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevA.24.3188
A. Haupt, J. Straub, Phys. Rev. E 59, 1795 (1999). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevE.59.1795
D.S. Cannell, Phys. Rev. A 12, 225 (1975). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevA.12.225
U. Närger, D.A. Balzarini, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9330 (1989). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9330
L.M. Radzhabova, G.V. Stepanov, I.M. Abdulagatov, K.A. Shakhbanov, J. Supercrit. Fluids 63, 115 (2012). https://doi-org../10.1016/j.supflu.2011.11.017
A. Kostrowicka Wyczalkowska, Kh.S. Abdulkadirova, M.A. Anisimov, J.V. Sengers, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 4985 (2000). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.1289244
J.A. Lipa, J.A. Nissen, D.A. Stricker, D.R. Swanson, T.C.P. Chui, Phys. Rev. B 68, 174518 (2003). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevB.68.174518
J.R. de Bruyn, D.A. Balzarini, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9243 (1989). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9243
J.A. Lipa, C. Edwards, M.J. Buckingham, Phys. Rev. A 15, 778 (1977). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevA.15.778
M.W. Pestak, M.H.W. Chan, Phys. Rev. B 30, 274 (1984). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevB.30.274
P. Losada-Pérez, C.A. Cerdeiriña, J. Thoen, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 128, 356 (2019). https://doi-org../10.1016/j.jct.2018.08.035
P. Losada-Pérez, C.S.P. Tripathi, J. Leys, C. Glorieux, J. Thoen, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 044505 (2011). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.3535567
M.R. Moldover, J.V. Sengers, R.W. Gammon, R.J. Hocken, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 79 (1979). https://doi-org../10.1103/RevModPhys.51.79
M. Barmatz, I. Hahn, J.A. Lipa, R.V. Duncan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1 (2007). https://doi-org../10.1103/RevModPhys.79.1
A. Oprisan, J.J. Hegseth, G.M. Smith, C. Lecoutre, Y. Garrabos, D.A. Beysens, Phys. Rev. E 84, 021202 (2011). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevE.84.021202
A. Oprisan, S.A. Oprisan, Y. Garrabos, C. Lecoutre-Chabot, D. Beysens, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 523 (2021). https://doi-org../10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01531-8
R.B. Griffiths, J.C. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1047 (1970). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevA.2.1047
J. Stephenson, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 895 (1971). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.1675016
A. Callegari, A. Magazzù, A. Gambassi, G. Volpe, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 213 (2021). https://doi-org../10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-01020-4
S. El-Showk, M.F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, A. Vichi, J. Stat. Phys. 157, 869 (2014). https://doi-org../10.1007/s10955-014-1042-7
R. Tomaschitz, Physica A 541, 123188 (2020). https://doi-org../10.1016/j.physa.2019.123188
R. Tomaschitz, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 629 (2021). https://doi-org../10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01542-5
X. Gabaix, Q. J. Econ. 114, 739 (1999). https://doi-org../10.1162/003355399556133
X. Gabaix, Annu. Rev. Econ. 1, 255 (2009). https://doi-org../10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142940
A. Clauset, C.R. Shalizi, M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Rev. 51, 661 (2009). https://doi-org../10.1137/070710111
E. Puppin, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 420 (2020). https://doi-org../10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00398-5
M.E.J. Newman, Contemp. Phys. 46, 323 (2005). https://doi-org../10.1080/00107510500052444
J.B. McDonald, Econometrica 52, 647 (1984). https://doi-org../10.2307/1913469
J.B. McDonald, Y.J. Xu, J. Econ. 66, 133 (1995). https://doi-org../10.1016/0304-4076(94)01612-4
R. Tomaschitz, Physica A 611, 128421 (2023). https://doi-org../10.1016/j.physa.2022.128421
J.S. Kouvel, M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 136, A1626 (1964). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRev.136.A1626
J.V. Sengers, J.G. Shanks, J. Stat. Phys. 137, 857 (2009). https://doi-org../10.1007/s10955-009-9840-z
R. Tomaschitz, J. Supercrit. Fluids 181, 105491 (2022). https://doi-org../10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105491
R. Tomaschitz, Int. J. Thermophys. 43, 130 (2022). https://doi-org../10.1007/s10765-022-03034-9
N. Fameli, D.A. Balzarini, Phys. Rev. B 75, 064203 (2007). https://doi-org../10.1103/PhysRevB.75.064203
P. Venkatesu, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 024902 (2005). https://doi-org../10.1063/1.1953576
Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica,® Version 13.1, Champaign, IL, (2022). https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Nonlinear regression of multiply broken power laws subject to parameter constraints
The least-squares regression sketched in this appendix will be exemplified with the broken power law (2.1), which is parametrized with positive amplitudes , , positive exponents , and real exponent . The amplitudes in (2.1) can be written as , with real exponent as fitting parameter, which is adapted to the decadic Log–Log representations of the heat capacity in the figures.
When minimizing the least-squares functional (defined below), we use rescaled parameters ,, related to ,, in (2.1) by
and inversely,
(Log denotes the decadic logarithm, and .) The reparametrized in (2.1) can be written as
The exponents , and amplitudes are positive like ,,.
The asymptotic power-law scaling of in (7.3) reads , with exponent and amplitude related to the rescaled fitting parameters by
which is the counterpart to Eqs. (2.2) in the new parametrization. By identifying with the calculated scaling exponent , the first identity in (7.4) becomes a constraint on the parameters, which can be used to eliminate the exponent from in (7.3), arriving at
with positive fitting parameters ,,,, . The exponent is predetermined input, and the amplitude in (7.3) is calculated from the regressed parameters via the second equation in (7.4).
The least-squares functional used for the regression reads
where are the data points enumerated in Sect. 2.1 and is the broken power law (7.5) depending on the fitting parameters ,. Once these parameters are determined by minimization of the functional (7.6), we find the parameters , and of in (2.1) by way of (7.2) and (7.4), cf. Table 2.
An efficient Mathematica® [44] routine to minimize a nonlinear functional such as (7.6) is FindMinimum[{chisquared[…],constraints},{initial values},MaxIterations → nmax]. The constraints are positivity constraints , where the double ampersand denotes the logical AND. Alternatively, positivity constraints for the iteration can be avoided by replacing the parameters by in (7.5).
To find reasonably accurate initial values for the fitting parameters, which is essential in nonlinear multiparameter regression, one uses in parametrization (2.1) rather than (7.5). The factors in (2.1) can be ordered by increasing amplitude, (with in (2.1)). In the range , the factors defined by the amplitudes are close to one and can be dropped. Therefore, an initial guess can be obtained by visually fitting the factors one by one, starting with the simple power law in (2.1) and increasing the range in each step by adding the respective data points and the respective factor. The amplitudes are the break points between the power-law segments (which are straight line segments in Log–Log plots) and the exponents determine the extent (curvature) of the transitional regions.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tomaschitz, R. Isobaric heat capacity of classical and quantum fluids: extending experimental data sets into the critical scaling regime. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 457 (2023). https://doi-org../10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04006-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi-org../10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04006-0